Damn, I feel as thou as I am writing far too much during the times I'm supposed to be asleep, oh well, bugger it, just need something to do.

 

All I want to to is watch the sky these days, but the sky is just freaking me out. Scares me to think that the world is going infitesimally crazy. I'm also getting pissed off at the fact of some of the ploys of the industry I'm slowly going to be working for is operating, and how others are fueling this messy fire. What I'm about to go on about is about the hot topic of 'Global Warming'. I guess some people are bound to read this and think I'm one crazy fool with some crazy ideas, what I am about to write about is about the what if and maybe even the truth, and it it might hurt.

 

GLOBAL WARMING - Is it me or does it seem like a marketing ploy and even a politcal excuse to score political points

 

Global warming is an intersting topic to work with, it is something which environmentalists, scientists and other big names people such as Al Gore and Richard Branson use to describe the changing environment of the Globe. The whole idea of 'Global Warming' is that the worlds' environment will become unsustainable because of the increasing Greenhouse Gasses such as CO2, Methane etc, which contribute to the trapping of the heat into the Earth, entering the atmosphere. The earth would then become somewhat like a greenhouse and the temperature would rise. As according to science and experiment, theoretically at a certain temperature the amount of vapour and liquid would somewhat settle and be stable. What if the use of 'Global Warming' is a marketing ploy just to distract you from the truth of the matter, a convenient excuse to broad rangingly cover the problems?

 

If the idea of 'Global Warmimg' is a marketing ploy then there is an inconvenient truth behind all of this. As yourself a question, are you consuming about the same amount of foods daily, and as such are you contributing to the global warming? If you think about it, maybe yes you are contributing to this problem, but who is to blame? everyone of us, because we are cotributing greenhouse gasses to the environment, not only from our breathing, but from our bodily wastes as well. So if this is the case then in order to save the environment is to have less people. Quite notibly data about population vs global warming should be looked at, and it can be seen that the larger the population, the greater the warming. The data relationship is directly proportional, meaning that if we have less people, the earth will be happy.

 

The use of 'Global warming' is a convenient excuse, namely because it is similar to that of the notion that sugar causes diebeties. Why? because everything really contatins a form of sugar, and substituting it with 'sugar free' makes no difference whatsoever to the proportion of people contracting this disease, namely diabeties 2. We fear that global warming is going to kill everything, and we want to preserve the environment, so now we are told about bio-fuels, it burns cleaner and is better for the environment. Are we fools blinded by our own sense of global justice that we forget 'burning'. THe basic idea of fuel is to burn it, and by burning it would mean the release of greenhouse pollutants such as CO2, thus the idea of 'bio-fuels' is a waste of time, it is no better to the environment than normal fuels.

 

Have a think about it people? will taking Greenhouse gasses out of the air for 20 million dollars be the solution of all our problems?

 

More to come in the following post tomorrow

 

Signing out

 

.:KrAkPoT:.

 

Before all of this, what